December 11, 2013 | By Scott Minerd, Global CIO
Whether the Federal Reserve starts to shrink its asset purchase program now or waits until the first daffodils of spring is meaningless, in the grand scheme of things. As I wrote last week, we appear to be at the start of a global synchronous expansion – with everything from Chinese export data to ISI’s Christmas Tree Sales survey looking up. This has been and will likely continue to be good news for global equity markets, but what about the bond market?
I continue to believe that we are not headed back to the dark days of fixed-income investing in the 1970s, when yields increased by more than 10 percentage points between 1971 and 1981. Instead we are likely to live through a period similar to the 1940s, when investors had a decade of rate stability, with rates range-bound between 1.95 percent and 2.7 percent. Although investors today have a much shorter fuse, the end of the Fed’s program of quantitative easing is not the same as raising rates. Nor is it the same as the Treasury Accord of 1951, when the Fed, exerting its independence, refused to keep rates pegged at a low rate after the start of the Korean War in 1950. Quite the opposite is likely to occur now. In conjunction with tapering, I believe that the Fed will likely strengthen its forward guidance and lower its unemployment target – pushing off a rate rise until after 2015.
Regardless of the Fed’s taper timing, the supply/demand dynamic for Treasuries is also shifting. At home, thanks to sequester and debt ceiling fights, the federal government is borrowing less. Overseas, international investors are looking anew at Treasuries. Japanese pensions, for example, are buying 10-year U.S. Treasury securities because the real return is highly attractive given the depreciation of the yen. Altogether, there are few if any visible obstacles to the improving investment outlook as we close out the year. Risk assets, and equities in particular, appear to have upside and 10-year Treasury yields will likely stay in a fairly narrow range, with an upper limit of about 3.5 percent.
Nearly half of third quarter real GDP growth came from the buildup of inventories. In real terms, the inventory increase was the largest in over 15 years. While this made the third quarter GDP figure appear strong on the surface, it presents a downside risk to fourth quarter GDP growth. Historically, changes in inventories tend to lag the growth rate of the overall economy, and the large inventory accumulation over the past two quarters is not supported by the rate of economic growth. This divergence suggests that there may be a significant slowing of inventory accumulation in the fourth quarter, and as a result, lower fourth quarter GDP growth.
Source: Haver Analytics, Guggenheim Investments. Data as of 3Q2013.
This article is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investing advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. This article contains opinions of the author but not necessarily those of Guggenheim Partners or its subsidiaries. The author’s opinions are subject to change without notice. Forward looking statements, estimates, and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary and non-proprietary research and other sources. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but are not assured as to accuracy. No part of this article may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Guggenheim Partners, LLC. ©2014, Guggenheim Partners. Past performance is not indicative of future results. There is neither representation nor warranty as to the current accuracy of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information.
Beijing is preparing for a protracted standoff as the U.S.-China trade war ramps up.
After the recession starts, high-yield bond and bank loan issuers have at least a 12-month runway before we experience a large wave of defaults.
Signs of economic strength suggest the market is wrong to price in a rate cut.
Portfolio Manager Adam Bloch and Macroeconomic and Investment Research Group Director Matt Bush share insights from the first quarter 2019 Fixed-Income Outlook.
Anne Walsh, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income, shares insights on the fixed-income market and explains the Guggenheim approach to solving the Core Conundrum.
You are now leaving this website.Guggenheim assumes no responsibility of the content or its accuracy.
Your browser does not support iframes.
2019 Guggenheim Partners, LLC. All rights reserved. Guggenheim, Guggenheim Partners and Innovative Solutions. Enduring Values. are registered trademarks of Guggenheim Capital, LLC.