May 17, 2018
Agency MBS performance was negative in the first quarter, driven largely by broad market volatility as rates rose, the yield curve flattened, and spreads widened. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. MBS index posted a -1.19 percent total return. Yields ended the quarter at 3.30 percent, higher than the previous quarter, while option-adjusted spreads were roughly 4 basis points wider over the quarter. Conventional MBS outperformed GNMA; 30-year MBS underperformed 15-year MBS; and lower coupons underperformed higher coupons. Prepayment speeds declined over the quarter.
Agency MBS yields ended the quarter at 3.30 percent, higher from the previous quarter, while option-adjusted spreads were roughly 4 basis points wider over the quarter.
Source: Bloomberg, Barclays, Guggenheim Investments. Data as of 3.31.2018. The zero-volatility spread measures the spread that an investor will receive over the entire Treasury spot rate curve. LHS = left hand side, RHS = right hand side.
In our view, MBS spreads still have the potential to widen modestly from here, as levels are tight compared to longer-term historical averages, and 2018 net supply is expected to be higher than it has been in recent years. However, carry remains attractive and could absorb most of the expected spread widening. Further, we expect the sector to continue to provide diversification and lower volatility within a broad fixed-income portfolio. We anticipate the current environment of rangebound rates, low volatility, and reasonable valuations relative to credit sectors will result in support for the sector as investors continue to look for opportunities to add high-quality spread assets. Moreover, market volatility and wider spreads in the first quarter validated the sector’s defensive profile. Stable Agency RMBS spreads relative to investment-grade corporate bonds have persisted since early February, resulting in strong performance for Agency MBS compared to the broader aggregate and the corporate subcomponent during the period. Strong sector performance is particularly notable since two of the largest buyers have stepped away recently: the Fed continues to reduce its MBS portfolio, and U.S. banks have not added in the sector.
We continue to favor less negatively convex assets in which either the collateral or structure offers some cash flow stability. Accordingly, we find select subsectors attractively priced in the current environment, including longer-maturity Agency multifamily, better call-protected pools, and some collateralized mortgage obligation structures. We continue to avoid assets such as Ginnie Mae MBS, in which valuations are relatively stretched and may be affected more by the Fed’s policies or change in regulatory regime.
Stable Agency RMBS spreads relative to investment-grade corporate bonds have persisted since early February, resulting in strong performance for Agency MBS compared to the broader aggregate and the corporate subcomponent during the period.
Source: Bloomberg Barclays, Guggenheim Investments. Data as of 3.31.2018.
—Aditya Agrawal, CFA, Director; Louis Pacilio, Vice President
This article is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investing advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. It contains opinions of the authors but not necessarily those of Guggenheim Partners or its subsidiaries. The authors’ opinions are subject to change without notice. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but are not assured as to accuracy. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Investing involves risk. In general, the value of fixed-income securities fall when interest rates rise. High-yield securities present more liquidity and credit risk than investment grade bonds and may be subject to greater volatility. Asset-backed securities, including mortgage-backed securities, may have structures that make their reaction to interest rates and other factors difficult to predict, making their prices volatile and they are subject to liquidity risk. Investments in floating rate senior secured syndicated bank loans and other floating rate securities involve special types of risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk and prepayment risk. Guggenheim Investments represents the following affiliated investment management businesses of Guggenheim Partners, LLC: Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC, Security Investors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC, Guggenheim Real Estate, LLC, GS GAMMA Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Partners Europe Limited, and Guggenheim Partners India Management. ©2018, Guggenheim Partners, LLC. No part of this article may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Guggenheim Partners, LLC.
After several quarters of low volatility, tight spreads, and abundant liquidity, financial conditions are shifting.
New developments in fiscal policy, the labor market, and the neutral interest rate suggest that the expansion could extend into the latter half of our recession range.
A framework for transitioning sustainable investing to an institutional asset class.
Global CIO Scott Minerd and Head of Macroeconomic and Investment Research Brian Smedley provide context and commentary to complement our recent publication, “Forecasting the Next Recession.”
In his market outlook, Global CIO Scott Minerd discusses the challenges of managing in a market melt up and highlights several charts from his recent piece, “10 Macro Themes to Watch in 2018.”
You are now leaving this website.Guggenheim assumes no responsibility of the content or its accuracy.
Your browser does not support iframes.
2018 Guggenheim Partners, LLC. All rights reserved. Guggenheim, Guggenheim Partners and Innovative Solutions. Enduring Values. are registered trademarks of Guggenheim Capital, LLC.