February 17, 2017
Optimism overtook the investment-grade corporate bond market in 2016. Demand for yield facilitated $1.2 trillion of capital raising by U.S. investment-grade corporate bond issuers ($652 billion on a net basis), surpassing 2015’s record by almost $15 billion. By year end, spreads in the energy sector had retraced to their tightest level since November 2014, when West Texas Intermediate spot oil prices averaged $77 per barrel. A positive 2017 earnings outlook fueled the rally more broadly, with average index spreads ending the year at their tightest level since March 2015, as markets priced in anticipated pro-growth policy changes. Yields have risen against tightening spreads as the market has priced in anticipated policy changes by the incoming administration into benchmark Treasury yields. Spreads appear tight, but yields look more attractive today than in the middle of 2016.
Demand for yield facilitated $1.2 trillion of capital raising by U.S. investment-grade corporate bond issuers ($652 billion on a net basis), surpassing 2015’s record by almost $15 billion.
Source: JP Morgan, Guggenheim Investments. Data as of 12.31.2016.
Investment-grade corporate bond spreads absorbed some of the increase in Treasury yields, with spreads tightening by 15 basis points quarter over quarter to 123 basis points. The biggest moves once again stemmed from spreads tightening in energy and basic materials. The backup in rates caused the Bloomberg Barclays Investment-Grade Corporate Bond index to suffer a loss of 2.8 percent during the fourth quarter of 2016, breaking a streak of three consecutive positive quarterly returns. However, investment-grade corporate bonds outperformed duration-matched Treasurys by 0.8 percent.
The prolonged period of low interest rates has facilitated investor willingness to accept weaker structural protections in exchange for yield. While this trend has existed for at least a couple of years already, it is beginning to garner real investor attention. The combination of weaker structures and hope-driven tightening in spreads heightens our concerns. We believe spreads can grind tighter from current levels, but weaker structures and increased leverage are currently laying the groundwork for future downgrades. We continue to focus on higher quality and timelier relative-value trades until spreads widen to compensate investors appropriately for lower-quality credits and weaker structural protections.
Treasury yields have risen by 104 basis points since bottoming at 1.36 percent to reach 2.40 percent as of Jan. 23. Investmentgrade corporate bond yields have followed Treasury yields higher, but to a lesser extent, demonstrating their capacity to absorb some of the backup in rates. Investment-grade bond yields bottomed out at 2.75 percent in July 2016, and were trading at 3.30 percent as of Jan. 23, an increase of 55 basis points.
Source: Bloomberg Barclays Indices, Guggenheim Investments. Data as of 1.23.2017. Note: Yield to Worst is for the Bloomberg Barclays Corporate Investment Grade index.
—Jeffrey Carefoot, CFA, Senior Managing Director; Justin Takata, Director
This article is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investing advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. It contains opinions of the authors but not necessarily those of Guggenheim Partners or its subsidiaries. The authors’ opinions are subject to change without notice. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but are not assured as to accuracy. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Investing involves risk. In general, the value of fixed-income securities fall when interest rates rise. High-yield securities present more liquidity and credit risk than investment grade bonds and may be subject to greater volatility. Asset-backed securities, including mortgage-backed securities, may have structures that make their reaction to interest rates and other factors difficult to predict, making their prices volatile and they are subject to liquidity risk. Investments in floating rate senior secured syndicated bank loans and other floating rate securities involve special types of risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk and prepayment risk. Guggenheim Investments represents the following affiliated investment management businesses of Guggenheim Partners, LLC: Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC, Security Investors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC, Guggenheim Real Estate, LLC, GS GAMMA Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Partners Europe Limited and Guggenheim Partners India Management. ©2017, Guggenheim Partners, LLC. No part of this article may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Guggenheim Partners, LLC.
After several quarters of low volatility, tight spreads, and abundant liquidity, financial conditions are shifting.
New developments in fiscal policy, the labor market, and the neutral interest rate suggest that the expansion could extend into the latter half of our recession range.
A framework for transitioning sustainable investing to an institutional asset class.
Global CIO Scott Minerd and Head of Macroeconomic and Investment Research Brian Smedley provide context and commentary to complement our recent publication, “Forecasting the Next Recession.”
In his market outlook, Global CIO Scott Minerd discusses the challenges of managing in a market melt up and highlights several charts from his recent piece, “10 Macro Themes to Watch in 2018.”
You are now leaving this website.Guggenheim assumes no responsibility of the content or its accuracy.
Your browser does not support iframes.
2018 Guggenheim Partners, LLC. All rights reserved. Guggenheim, Guggenheim Partners and Innovative Solutions. Enduring Values. are registered trademarks of Guggenheim Capital, LLC.