March 07, 2019
In the early weeks of 2019, high-yield corporates have retraced almost half of the spread widening that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2018. Spreads widened by 200 basis points in the fourth quarter, but have tightened in 2019. At this pace, we may even revisit post-crisis tights of 327 basis points. Our Macroeconomic and Investment Research Group believes the Fed will be forced to pause its rate hiking campaign through the first half of 2019 as it reacts to the recent tightening in financial conditions. We expect this pause to support high-yield corporate returns in the near term. The rally in oil also supports some upside for energy credits, which still comprise 15 percent of the high-yield market. Our Macroeconomic and Investment Research Group’s oil model puts West Texas Intermediate prices closer to $70 per barrel in the second half of 2019.
High-yield corporates have retraced almost half of the spread widening that occurred in the fourth quarter. Spreads widened by 200 basis points in the fourth quarter of 2018 but have tightened in 2019.
Source: Guggenheim Investments, ICE Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Data as of 1.24.2019.
The ICE BofA Merrill Lynch Constrained High-Yield index lost 4.7 percent in the fourth quarter. In a stark reversal from previous quarters, lower quality significantly underperformed higher quality. BBs and Bs lost 3.0 percent and 4.9 percent in the quarter, while CCCs lost 10.3 percent on a total return basis. We had expected this reversal to occur at some point this year, given very stretched valuations in CCC corporates relative to Bs and BBs at the end of the third quarter of 2018. However, the recent selloff pushed relative value back in favor of CCCs, allowing the lower quality tranches to outperform higher quality in the rebound. High-yield corporates are up year to date, providing a healthy start to 2019 performance.
As the December freeze in activity thawed, we saw a healthy supply of high-yield corporates. After shutting down for five weeks in late 2018, year-to-date high-yield corporate bond issuance is now tracking above every year since 2015. Anecdotally, we find many deals to be oversubscribed as the Fed’s pause has shifted demand from floating-rate to fixed-rate assets. Though high-yield fund flows were somewhat shaky to start the year, they are beginning to see strong inflows with two of the last four weeks ending Feb. 6 recorded as the largest weekly inflows since mid-2016. This demand dynamic may continue while the Fed is on pause. However, given fading tailwinds and slowing global growth, we remain cautious in our approach to credit investing, and would not look to add much spread duration at this point in the cycle.
After the December freeze in activity thawed, high-yield corporate issuance is now tracking the pace of the last few years.
Source: Guggenheim Investments, S&P LCD. Data as of 2.8.2019.
—Thomas Hauser, Senior Managing Director; Rich de Wet, Director
This article is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investing advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. It contains opinions of the authors but not necessarily those of Guggenheim Partners or its subsidiaries. The authors’ opinions are subject to change without notice. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but are not assured as to accuracy. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Investing involves risk. In general, the value of fixed-income securities fall when interest rates rise. High-yield securities present more liquidity and credit risk than investment grade bonds and may be subject to greater volatility. Asset-backed securities, including mortgage-backed securities, may have structures that make their reaction to interest rates and other factors difficult to predict, making their prices volatile and they are subject to liquidity risk. Investments in floating rate senior secured syndicated bank loans and other floating rate securities involve special types of risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk and prepayment risk. Guggenheim Investments represents the following affiliated investment management businesses of Guggenheim Partners, LLC: Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC, Security Investors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC, GS GAMMA Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Partners Europe Limited, and Guggenheim Partners India Management.
©2019, Guggenheim Partners, LLC. No part of this article may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Guggenheim Partners, LLC.
Despite a strong March 2021 jobs report, full employment remains far away.
A Green New Deal should not be viewed as a big government program, but as an opportunity to reinvent vast swaths of the U.S. economy while pursuing the laudable goal of carbon neutrality.
Even as credit spreads have narrowed, further value remains.
Portfolio Manager Adam Bloch and Matt Bush, a Director in the Macroeconomic and Investment Research Group, share their outlook for the first quarter 2021.
Scott Minerd, Chairman of Investments and Global CIO, discussed his outlook for markets and the economy with CNBC’s Brian Sullivan during the Milken Institute 2020 Global Conference.
You are now leaving this website.Guggenheim assumes no responsibility of the content or its accuracy.
Your browser does not support iframes.
2021 Guggenheim Partners, LLC. All rights reserved. Guggenheim, Guggenheim Partners and Innovative Solutions. Enduring Values. are registered trademarks of Guggenheim Capital, LLC.