November 14, 2017
Major news headlines’ impact on the municipal market was pacified by persistent low volatility and favorable technical dynamics in the third quarter. Major hurricanes, the potential restructuring of Hartford, budget impasses in Connecticut and Pennsylvania, tensions between the United States and North Korea, uncertainty surrounding the Fed, and the Trump administration’s policy reform efforts have failed to catalyze meaningful price movement in the overall municipal market. Demand for municipal bonds may benefit from domestic tax reform and the global low interest-rate environment. The Trump administration’s initial tax reform proposal, which included the elimination of itemized state and local tax deductions and the alternative minimum tax (AMT), would enhance the relative tax benefits of tax-exempt bonds issued by states with high marginal income tax rates, and nullify the rationale for AMT bonds’ discounts to their respective tax-exempt counterparts. Due to the relative value of tax-exemptions, highly taxed states such as California, New York, and Illinois have become disproportionately represented in the taxexempt municipal market. On the taxable side, the municipal market has seen swelling demand from foreign buyers driven by absolute yield objectives and regulatory changes pertaining to capital requirements for insurers and pension funds. As of Sept. 30, year-to-date supply is down 14 percent over the same period last year, suggesting issuers are apprehensive to come to market ahead of possible federal infrastructure plans. Consistent with past years, we expect supply to wane by the end of the year.
Due to the relative value of tax-exemptions, highly taxed states such as California, New York, and Illinois have become disproportionately represented in the tax-exempt municipal market.
Source: SIFMA, Guggenheim Investments. Data as of 10.8.2017.
The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond index posted a 1.1 percent gain during the third quarter of 2017, with longer-maturity bonds continuing to outperform the short-end and lower-quality bonds outperforming higher-quality bonds. BBB-rated and A-rated municipal bonds returned 2.8 percent and 1.2 percent, versus 0.8 percent for AA-rated bonds and 0.7 percent for AAA-rated bonds.
After a record year for new issuance in 2016, municipal bond investors’ insatiable demand has led them to make concessions, while issuers appear to enjoy minimal resistance in capital markets. Several healthcare issuers have successfully refinanced debt with bond documents that significantly weaken covenants or even release collateral at unchanged market levels, despite declining fundamentals. Considering the strong technical demand, we emphasize the importance of credit discipline.
As of Sept. 30, year-to-date supply is down 14 percent over the same period last year, suggesting issuers are apprehensive to come to market ahead of possible federal infrastructure plans. Consistent with past years, we expect supply to wane by the end of the year.
Source: Thomson Reuters, The Bond Buyer, Guggenheim Investments. Data as of 9.30.2017.
—James Pass, Senior Managing Director; Allen Li, CFA, Managing Director
This article is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investing advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. It contains opinions of the authors but not necessarily those of Guggenheim Partners or its subsidiaries. The authors’ opinions are subject to change without notice. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but are not assured as to accuracy. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Investing involves risk. In general, the value of fixed-income securities fall when interest rates rise. High-yield securities present more liquidity and credit risk than investment grade bonds and may be subject to greater volatility. Asset-backed securities, including mortgage-backed securities, may have structures that make their reaction to interest rates and other factors difficult to predict, making their prices volatile and they are subject to liquidity risk. Investments in floating rate senior secured syndicated bank loans and other floating rate securities involve special types of risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk and prepayment risk. Guggenheim Investments represents the following affiliated investment management businesses of Guggenheim Partners, LLC: Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC, Security Investors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC, Guggenheim Real Estate, LLC, GS GAMMA Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Partners Europe Limited and Guggenheim Partners India Management. ©2017, Guggenheim Partners, LLC. No part of this article may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Guggenheim Partners, LLC.
Good risk management leads to good decision making.
Why active has the potential to outperform passive in fixed income.
Lower-quality credit spreads have more potential to widen than tighten.
Portfolio Manager Adam Bloch and Matt Bush, a Director in the Macroeconomic and Investment Research Group, share insights from the third quarter 2019 Fixed-Income Outlook.
Anne Walsh, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income, shares insights on the fixed-income market and explains the Guggenheim approach to solving the Core Conundrum.
You are now leaving this website.Guggenheim assumes no responsibility of the content or its accuracy.
Your browser does not support iframes.
2019 Guggenheim Partners, LLC. All rights reserved. Guggenheim, Guggenheim Partners and Innovative Solutions. Enduring Values. are registered trademarks of Guggenheim Capital, LLC.