May 24, 2016
While the Puerto Rico situation dominates the news, pockets of volatility are beginning to appear that impact both large urban issuers and small rural authorities in the municipal market. Familiar names, such as the state of Illinois, Atlantic City and Chicago Public Schools, among others, garner the majority of the headlines, but markets are also seeing a growing failure among state and local leaders to find solutions to other problems. With budget impasses becoming the norm, court decisions overturning pension reform becoming more frequent, and labor relations requiring constant attention, the rating agencies have felt compelled to review not just an issuer’s ability to service its debt, but also its ability to govern.
Flows into municipal bond funds have been strong against volatile credit market conditions, totaling $9.3 billion in the first quarter of 2016. Demand from individual investors has a meaningful impact on the municipal bond market given that individuals and mutual funds represent 70 percent of the total market outstanding.
Source: Lipper, Barclays, Guggenheim Investments. Data as of 3.31.2016.
Against this backdrop of uncertainty, technicals are strong, with inflows into municipal bond mutual funds and ETFs remaining steady, and upgrades outnumbering downgrades. In the first quarter of 2016, the Barclays Municipal Bond index recorded a gain of 1.7 percent, with the Barclays Revenue Bond index outperforming the General Obligation Bond index by 33 basis points. State tax collections, according to the most recent report released by the Rockefeller Institute of Government, are still growing albeit at a slower pace, creating an environment in which credit spreads are tight and municipal yields as a percent of U.S. Treasurys are range bound.
Accordingly, we are selective in this environment and still favor higher-yielding revenue bonds—those supported by dedicated revenue streams, such as utilities, transportation bonds and water and sewer systems—over general obligation bonds. On a risk-adjusted basis, A-rated bonds present an opportunity when compared to higher-rated obligations. The BBB market is less attractive given the historically tight spreads that have resulted from the limited investment opportunities for significant mutual fund inflows.
BBB-rated municipal bonds have historically offered 101 bps of additional yield over A-rated municipal bonds, on average. This yield differential has narrowed to only 61 bps as of March 31, 2016, highlighting better relative value in A-rated municipal bonds.
Source: Barclays, Guggenheim Investments. Data as of 3.31.2016.
—James Pass, Senior Managing Director; Allen Li, CFA, Managing Director
This article is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investing advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. It contains opinions of the authors but not necessarily those of Guggenheim Partners or its subsidiaries. The authors’ opinions are subject to change without notice. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but are not assured as to accuracy. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Investing involves risk. In general, the value of fixed-income securities fall when interest rates rise. High-yield securities present more liquidity and credit risk than investment-grade bonds and may be subject to greater volatility. Asset-backed securities, including mortgage-backed securities, may have structures that make their reaction to interest rates and other factors difficult to predict, making their prices volatile and they are subject to liquidity risk. Investments in floating-rate senior-secured syndicated bank loans and other floating-rate securities involve special types of risks, including credit risk, interest-rate risk, liquidity risk and prepayment risk.
Guggenheim Investments represents the following affiliated investment management businesses of Guggenheim Partners, LLC: Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC, Security Investors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC, Guggenheim Real Estate, LLC, Transparent Value Advisors, LLC, GS GAMMA Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Partners Europe Limited and Guggenheim Partners India Management.
If you want to see who the real victims of tariffs are, go look in the mirror.
Shortening duration, maintaining an investment-grade portfolio, and generating attractive yields do not have to be competing investment objectives for core fixed-income investors.
After several quarters of low volatility, tight spreads, and abundant liquidity, financial conditions are shifting.
Global CIO Scott Minerd and Head of Macroeconomic and Investment Research Brian Smedley provide context and commentary to complement our recent publication, “Forecasting the Next Recession.”
In his market outlook, Global CIO Scott Minerd discusses the challenges of managing in a market melt up and highlights several charts from his recent piece, “10 Macro Themes to Watch in 2018.”
You are now leaving this website.Guggenheim assumes no responsibility of the content or its accuracy.
Your browser does not support iframes.
2018 Guggenheim Partners, LLC. All rights reserved. Guggenheim, Guggenheim Partners and Innovative Solutions. Enduring Values. are registered trademarks of Guggenheim Capital, LLC.