December 23, 2019
Non-Agency RMBS has exhibited positive performance over 2019, returning 1.4 percent in the third quarter and 7.4 percent year to date. Although performance was directionally positive, the sector’s moderate interest rate sensitivity and spread volatility resulted in more tepid performance than the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate index and other credit sectors.
Trading volumes and investor participation in the secondary market was low in the third quarter and did not meaningfully increase from the quiet summer months, but new issuance spiked after August and was well received by investors. New issuance reached $24 billion in the third quarter and $61 billion year to date. After 10 years of negative net issuance, 2019 issuance is expected to exceed the paydowns from the outstanding market, resulting in positive net supply and a stabilization in overall market size.
Non-Agency RMBS issuance restarted in earnest over 2013–2015 with the establishment of the GSE credit risk transfer (CRT) programs, and regular non- and re-performing backed deals and non-QM and jumbo prime deals. With increased new issuance, the composition of the non-Agency market has shifted away from pre-crisis and towards post-crisis securities.
Post-crisis RMBS accounted for just 10 percent of the market in 2016. It now accounts for one-third.
Source: Guggenheim Investments, CoreLogic, Citi Research. Data as of 9.30.2019.
Post-crisis RMBS comprised only 10 percent of the market in 2016 but now comprises approximately 37 percent of the market. Post-crisis RMBS has maintained reasonably stable underwriting standards, while the credit-sensitive pre-crisis sector has exhibited ongoing credit improvements. These trends have contributed to a decline in the overall riskiness of the sector and a corresponding broadening of investor sponsorship. Although the shift in composition away from pre-crisis deals began with the re-opening of primary RMBS issuance in 2013, trading volumes remained stubbornly focused on the pre-crisis segment and only recently began migrating towards post-crisis tranches.
Trading volumes have mirrored outstanding volumes and have begun migrating to post-crisis issuance.
Source: Guggenheim Investments, SIFMA. Data as of 9.30.2019.
We remain constructive on the performance prospects for non-Agency RMBS as borrowers continue to benefit from favorable consumer-credit and housing fundamentals, which should translate to stable credit performance of recent issuance and improving bond cash flows for pre-crisis deals. We continue to favor senior, shorter maturity classes for their lower price volatility as well as selected credit-sensitive, pre-crisis passthroughs that should benefit from constructive credit fundamentals.
—Karthik Narayanan, CFA, Managing Director; Roy Park, Director
This article is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investing advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. It contains opinions of the authors but not necessarily those of Guggenheim Partners or its subsidiaries. The authors’ opinions are subject to change without notice. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but are not assured as to accuracy. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Investing involves risk. In general, the value of fixed-income securities fall when interest rates rise. High-yield securities present more liquidity and credit risk than investment grade bonds and may be subject to greater volatility. Asset-backed securities, including mortgage-backed securities, may have structures that make their reaction to interest rates and other factors difficult to predict, making their prices volatile and they are subject to liquidity risk. Investments in floating rate senior secured syndicated bank loans and other floating rate securities involve special types of risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk and prepayment risk. Guggenheim Investments represents the following affiliated investment management businesses of Guggenheim Partners, LLC: Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC, Security Investors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC, Guggenheim Real Estate, LLC, GS GAMMA Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Partners Europe Limited, and Guggenheim Partners India Management. ©2018, Guggenheim Partners, LLC. No part of this article may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Guggenheim Partners, LLC.
Despite a strong March 2021 jobs report, full employment remains far away.
A Green New Deal should not be viewed as a big government program, but as an opportunity to reinvent vast swaths of the U.S. economy while pursuing the laudable goal of carbon neutrality.
Even as credit spreads have narrowed, further value remains.
Portfolio Manager Adam Bloch and Matt Bush, a Director in the Macroeconomic and Investment Research Group, share their outlook for the first quarter 2021.
Scott Minerd, Chairman of Investments and Global CIO, discussed his outlook for markets and the economy with CNBC’s Brian Sullivan during the Milken Institute 2020 Global Conference.
You are now leaving this website.Guggenheim assumes no responsibility of the content or its accuracy.
Your browser does not support iframes.
2021 Guggenheim Partners, LLC. All rights reserved. Guggenheim, Guggenheim Partners and Innovative Solutions. Enduring Values. are registered trademarks of Guggenheim Capital, LLC.