December 23, 2019
Ongoing concerns about the longevity of the current credit cycle, memories of the fourth quarter 2018 selloff, and reduced investor interest in floating-rate securities all weighed on CLO spreads during the third quarter. Our thesis over the last 12 months to favor short, senior CLOs has worked as expected: Pricing for short, senior CLOs remained steady, but pricing for riskier subordinated tranches weakened by 10–45 basis points in the third quarter. Total returns over the last 12 months AAA CLO tranches returned 3.52 percent, while total returns for subordinated BBB and BB securities returned just 2.83 percent and 2.72 percent, respectively.
Senior CLO tranches have outperformed subordinate tranches on a nominal basis (and especially on a risk-adjusted basis) over the last 12 months.
Source: Guggenheim Investments, JP Morgan. Data as of 10.31.2019.
Investors have not been adequately compensated to assume the additional credit and spread duration risk of subordinated CLO securities. While weakening spreads did not materially impact new issuance volumes in the third quarter of $25 billion, refinance and reset volumes were anemic. We remain cautious on subordinated CLO investments, and believe short, senior CLO tranches have a superior investment profile for the remainder of the year.
The sharp interest rate rally has caused nominal yields in ABS securities to decline since the beginning of the year. However, credit spreads for certain ABS subsectors widened over the same time.
Credit spreads for certain ABS subsectors have widened. The underperformance of ABS credit spreads is owing to those securities’ weak call protection, not credit concerns. As interest rates declined, prices rose and investors increasingly focused on yield to call analytics.
Source: Guggenheim Investments. Data as of 11.5.2019.
The underperformance of ABS credit spreads is owing to those securities’ weak call protection, not credit concerns. As interest rates declined, prices rose and investors increasingly focused on yield to call analytics. With relatively long open periods, or timeframes in which borrowers can refinance existing ABS without any prepayment penalty, esoteric ABS are prone to call and reinvestment risk in sharp interest rate rallies. These risks were particularly acute in 2019's rate rally. Seasoned esoteric ABS have drifted toward premium dollar prices over the year, and when combined with short non-call periods and long open periods, the spread and yield profiles vary widely on a yield-to-call and a yield-to-maturity basis. To address these concerns, we have focused our investment activity on new issuance and shied away from premium-priced secondary offers. Par-priced new issuance avoids the skewed return profiles and offers extended call protection compared to more seasoned premium priced securities. Our investment focus remains on bespoke opportunities and new issue commercial ABS and aircraft ABS.
—Peter Van Gelderen, Managing Director
This article is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investing advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. It contains opinions of the authors but not necessarily those of Guggenheim Partners or its subsidiaries. The authors’ opinions are subject to change without notice. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but are not assured as to accuracy. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Investing involves risk. In general, the value of fixed-income securities fall when interest rates rise. High-yield securities present more liquidity and credit risk than investment grade bonds and may be subject to greater volatility. Asset-backed securities, including mortgage-backed securities, may have structures that make their reaction to interest rates and other factors difficult to predict, making their prices volatile and they are subject to liquidity risk. Investments in floating rate senior secured syndicated bank loans and other floating rate securities involve special types of risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk and prepayment risk. Guggenheim Investments represents the following affiliated investment management businesses of Guggenheim Partners, LLC: Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC, Security Investors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC, GS GAMMA Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Partners Europe Limited, and Guggenheim Partners India Management.
©2019, Guggenheim Partners, LLC. No part of this article may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Guggenheim Partners, LLC.
Ten charts illustrate the macroeconomic trends most likely to shape Fed policy and investment performance in 2020 and beyond.
Ultimately, investors will awaken to the rising tide of defaults and downgrades.
In all likelihood, the Fed has successfully staved off recession, but current spreads reflect just how little upside there is in credit.
Brian Smedley, Head of the Macroeconomic and Investment Research Group, and Portfolio Manager Adam Bloch share insights from the fourth quarter 2019 Fixed-Income Outlook.
Anne Walsh, Chief Investment Officer for Fixed Income, shares insights on the fixed-income market and explains the Guggenheim approach to solving the Core Conundrum.
You are now leaving this website.Guggenheim assumes no responsibility of the content or its accuracy.
Your browser does not support iframes.
2020 Guggenheim Partners, LLC. All rights reserved. Guggenheim, Guggenheim Partners and Innovative Solutions. Enduring Values. are registered trademarks of Guggenheim Capital, LLC.