February 17, 2017
High-yield bond spreads tightened meaningfully in the second half of 2016 on the back of an improving corporate earnings outlook and declining high-yield default rate projections. High-yield bond spreads ended 2016 at only 472 basis points, on average, which is historically consistent with a default rate projection between 2 and 4 percent. Overall, the market appears to be priced for the fundamental recovery that we expect to see in earnings data, interest coverage, and leverage multiples by year-end 2017.
Declining default rate projections have caused spreads to retrace nearly all of the widening that has taken place since the beginning of the oil bear market in July 2014.
Source: Moody’s, Credit Suisse, Bloomberg, Guggenheim Investments. Data as of 12.31.2016.
The Credit Suisse High Yield index gained 2.5 percent in the fourth quarter, making it the fourth consecutive quarter of positive returns. For all of 2016, the index returned 18.4 percent, its best performance since 2009. High-yield bond spreads tightened 95 basis points quarter over quarter (281 basis points year over year) to 472 basis points, retracing 80 percent of the spread widening that has occurred since the oil bear market began in July 2014. All rating categories delivered positive returns and CCC-rated bonds continued to outperform BB-rated bonds and B-rated bonds.
We remain constructive on high yield at current valuations, but are keeping an eye on early indications that this rally is overextended. For example, the CBOE VIX index, which tends to be closely correlated to changes in corporate bond spreads, has been below its historical average for 52 consecutive trading days. Therefore, potential factors that could spook equity investors may also drive spread volatility in the high-yield sector. Given that the market is already priced for a fundamental recovery, it may be vulnerable to disappointing economic data as well. That said, high-yield spreads have room to tighten from current levels. On average, the troughs in average high-yield corporate bond spreads were 312 basis points in 1998 and 274 basis points in 2007. High-yield spreads also have some room to tighten against investment-grade corporate bonds. While we are not expecting it, in the near term the emergence of disappointing data would cause some contained spread widening. But between now until year end, we expect spreads will see tighter levels.
Our internal calculations show that high-yield corporate bond spreads have only been tighter 29 percent of the time since 1986 (based on monthly spreads). Although they appear to be rich on a standalone basis, we expect that spreads will see tighter levels this year. When expressed as a premium to investment-grade corporate bonds, the chart shows that between 2005 and 2007, high-yield bond spreads were 61 basis points tighter than today, on average.
Source: Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Guggenheim Investments. Data as of 12.31.2016
—Thomas Hauser, Managing Director; Rich de Wet, Vice President
This article is distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investing advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. It contains opinions of the authors but not necessarily those of Guggenheim Partners or its subsidiaries. The authors’ opinions are subject to change without notice. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but are not assured as to accuracy. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Investing involves risk. In general, the value of fixed-income securities fall when interest rates rise. High-yield securities present more liquidity and credit risk than investment grade bonds and may be subject to greater volatility. Asset-backed securities, including mortgage-backed securities, may have structures that make their reaction to interest rates and other factors difficult to predict, making their prices volatile and they are subject to liquidity risk. Investments in floating rate senior secured syndicated bank loans and other floating rate securities involve special types of risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk and prepayment risk. Guggenheim Investments represents the following affiliated investment management businesses of Guggenheim Partners, LLC: Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC, Security Investors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC, Guggenheim Real Estate, LLC, GS GAMMA Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Partners Europe Limited and Guggenheim Partners India Management. ©2017, Guggenheim Partners, LLC. No part of this article may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Guggenheim Partners, LLC.
After several quarters of low volatility, tight spreads, and abundant liquidity, financial conditions are shifting.
New developments in fiscal policy, the labor market, and the neutral interest rate suggest that the expansion could extend into the latter half of our recession range.
A framework for transitioning sustainable investing to an institutional asset class.
Global CIO Scott Minerd and Head of Macroeconomic and Investment Research Brian Smedley provide context and commentary to complement our recent publication, “Forecasting the Next Recession.”
In his market outlook, Global CIO Scott Minerd discusses the challenges of managing in a market melt up and highlights several charts from his recent piece, “10 Macro Themes to Watch in 2018.”
You are now leaving this website.Guggenheim assumes no responsibility of the content or its accuracy.
Your browser does not support iframes.
2018 Guggenheim Partners, LLC. All rights reserved. Guggenheim, Guggenheim Partners and Innovative Solutions. Enduring Values. are registered trademarks of Guggenheim Capital, LLC.